NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9560 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (2010MHz vs 1237MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+116%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon E9560 PCIe
5.7 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1237 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2304
96
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.58 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
178.1 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.700 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.700 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
356.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
130W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
