NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 50.82GB/s)
2592 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+2051%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition
0.574 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
794 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
50.82GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
480
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.784 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.35 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
574.1 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Whistler
-
GPU Variant
Whistler PRO
(216-0810005)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
