Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 M270

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 M270

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 144% (2010MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1851%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M270
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy