NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 20GB VRAM RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2010MHz vs 1560MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (20GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12.35 TFLOPS
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile
+55%
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Workstation Ada
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
720 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
48
3072
Shading Units
6144
96
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
192
24
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
GB205
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
