NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+3625%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
12
3072
Shading Units
96
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
28W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GE-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
