NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 8 months late

896 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (35W vs 175W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1530MHz vs 1455MHz)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +34%

8.94 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile

6.659 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation

VS

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Jul 2019

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

GeForce 20 Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

1470 MHz

1455 MHz

Boost Clock

1530 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

24

SM Count

34

-

Compute Units

-

3072

Shading Units

2176

96

TMUs

136

48

ROPs

64

96

Tensor Cores

272

24

RT Cores

34

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

97.92 GPixel/s

139.7 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

208.1 GTexel/s

8.940 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

13.32 TFLOPS

8.940 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

6.659 TFLOPS

139.7 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

208.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

TU106

-

GPU Variant

TU106-410-A1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

12 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

10.8 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

445 mm²

Board Design

35W

TDP

175W

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

7.5

6.7

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

4

NVIDIA GeForce G110M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

5

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

6

AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M445

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6450M

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance