NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1455MHz vs 1245MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
+71%
15.3 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1245 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
48
3072
Shading Units
6144
96
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
96
Tensor Cores
192
24
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
119.5 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.0 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.30 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.30 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
239.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
GA104-775-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
