Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
M5x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
M56
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy