Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1184%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
480
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Whistler
-
GPU Variant
Whistler XT (216-0810001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy