NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+545%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.31 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.62 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1385 GFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1385 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
86.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GLM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
