NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1455MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+263%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
