NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 A320

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R5 A320

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 8 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1455MHz vs 825MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)

2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1593%

8.94 TFLOPS

Radeon R5 A320

0.528 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation

VS

Radeon R5 A320

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Jan 2015

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

All-In-One

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

750 MHz

1455 MHz

Boost Clock

825 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1000 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

1024MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

DDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

64bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

16.00GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

5

24

SM Count

-

3072

Shading Units

320

96

TMUs

20

48

ROPs

8

96

Tensor Cores

-

24

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

12 MB

L2 Cache

128 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

6.600 GPixel/s

139.7 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

16.50 GTexel/s

8.940 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

8.940 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

528.0 GFLOPS

139.7 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Board Design

35W

TDP

Unknown

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

Jet

-

GPU Variant

Jet PRO (216-0856040)

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

GCN 1.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

0.69 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

56 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1 (1.2)

1.3

Vulkan

1.2.170

8.9

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 305M

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 570X

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M5800

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 7630M

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M8900

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6330M

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game