Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 A330

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 A330

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 A330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1256%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 A330
0.659 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
3072
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Exo
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy