NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M275

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 M275

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 9 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1455MHz vs 925MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +655%

8.94 TFLOPS

Radeon R9 M275

1.184 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation

VS

Radeon R9 M275

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Jan 2014

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

Gem System

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

900 MHz

1455 MHz

Boost Clock

925 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1000 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

64.00GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

10

24

SM Count

-

3072

Shading Units

640

96

TMUs

40

48

ROPs

16

96

Tensor Cores

-

24

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

12 MB

L2 Cache

256 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

14.80 GPixel/s

139.7 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

37.00 GTexel/s

8.940 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

8.940 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1184 GFLOPS

139.7 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W

TDP

Unknown

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

Venus

-

GPU Variant

Venus XTX (216-0846033)

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

GCN 1.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

1.5 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1 (1.2)

1.3

Vulkan

1.2.170

8.9

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 705M

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M5800

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster