NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (2010MHz vs 1455MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
8.94 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+38%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
24
3072
Shading Units
3072
96
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
96
24
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
