NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2025MHz vs 1455MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+7%
8.94 TFLOPS
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
8.294 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
64
24
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.80 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
