NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W4130M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 156% (2115MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1952%
12.99 TFLOPS
FirePro W4130M
0.633 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1635 MHz
Base Clock
775 MHz
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Mars
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
