Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W7170M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W7170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +338%
12.99 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy