Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 530v to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2992 additional rendering cores
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +16137%
12.99 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 530v
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
80
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
M92
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy