NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation NVIDIA GeForce 310M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 13 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock2115MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)

3056 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +26410%

12.99 TFLOPS

GeForce 310M

0.049 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

VS

GeForce 310M

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Jan 2010

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

GeForce 300M

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz

Base Clock

-

2115 MHz

Boost Clock

-

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

667 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

1024MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

DDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

64bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

10.67GB/s

Render Config

24

SM Count

2

-

Compute Units

-

3072

Shading Units

16

96

TMUs

8

48

ROPs

4

96

Tensor Cores

-

24

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

12 MB

L2 Cache

32 KB

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

2.424 GPixel/s

203.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

4.848 GTexel/s

12.99 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

12.99 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

48.96 GFLOPS

203.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

GT218

-

GPU Variant

N11M-GE1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Tesla 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

40 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

0.26 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

57 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

14W

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

11.1 (10_1)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

8.9

CUDA

1.2

6.7

Shader Model

4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 8670M

7

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 575X

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD