Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +58945%
12.99 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
1
3072
Shading Units
8
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy