Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 335M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +8226%
12.99 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 335M
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
9
3072
Shading Units
72
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
28W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N11P-GS1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy