Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +8920%
12.99 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
120
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
M86
-
GPU Variant
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy