NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P106M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (2115MHz vs 1291MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+336%
12.99 TFLOPS
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1635 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
9
3072
Shading Units
1152
96
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
