Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon E2400

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3032 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +26962%
12.99 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
40
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV610
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy