NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1695MHz vs 1266MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+167%
15.62 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
2304
144
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
32
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
