Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V5600

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
5000 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +11900%
23.04 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
120
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
89W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net