NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+22940%
23.04 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
1
5120
Shading Units
48
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
19W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
