NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+71900%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
40
160
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
