Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4720 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +4330%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

40
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
5120
Shading Units
400
160
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy