NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 149% (2250MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+454%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
4.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
863 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
2304
160
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
