NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (2640MHz vs 2250MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+70%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050
13.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
2505 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
18
5120
Shading Units
2560
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
120
40
RT Cores
18
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
115W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
