NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+7429%
23.04 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
