NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2006
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
-
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
