NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (2250MHz vs 2040MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+635%
23.04 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
32bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
12
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
