Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T400

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (2250MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +2006%
23.04 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
6
5120
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net