Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation +429%
15.82 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1110 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
1792
160
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
247.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
15.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
247.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net