NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2175MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 8GB)
3840 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+251%
26.73 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+303%
4737
CMP 40HX
1174
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Feb 2021
Workstation Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
36
6144
Shading Units
2304
192
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
288
48
RT Cores
36
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
185W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
