Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6104 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +83431%
26.73 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
6144
Shading Units
40
192
TMUs
4
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy