Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 130W)

Score

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Workstation Ada
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV380
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
-
© 2025 - TopCPU.net