Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +4253%
26.73 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
May 2011
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy