Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7800

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
4704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +1225%
26.73 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
1440
192
TMUs
72
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy