Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
6080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +12750%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
8
6144
Shading Units
64
192
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G94B
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy