Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +6806%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy