CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+4886%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
448bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
216
192
TMUs
72
80
ROPs
28
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
130W
TDP
171W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
2
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
3
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
4
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
5
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
6
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
7
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
8
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9050
9
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
10
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
Related News
1
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
2
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
3
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
5
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
6
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
7
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
8
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
9
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy