Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +3865%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
448bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
80
80
ROPs
28
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
219W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy