NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
5808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+2455%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
1.046 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Sep 2011
Workstation Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
7
6144
Shading Units
336
192
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF114
-
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
