NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 134% (2175MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+400%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Workstation Ada
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
2880
192
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
48
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
