Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +2327%
26.73 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250XE
1.101 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
Workstation Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.76 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.40 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1101 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net