Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2175MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +986%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1176 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.43 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GTX 960 OEM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.8
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy